Michigan News
10:46 pm
Tue February 4, 2014

Juvenile 'Lifers' Have No Shot at Parole

So-called "juvenile lifers" in Michigan would not get a chance at parole under a bill approved Tuesday by the state House. That's unless the Michigan Supreme Court or the U.S. Supreme Court rule otherwise.

No shot at parole for "juvenile lifers" in bill passed by state House 

By Jake Neher

So-called "juvenile lifers" in Michigan would not get a chance at parole under a bill approved Tuesday by the state House. That's unless the Michigan Supreme Court or the U.S. Supreme Court rule otherwise.

Credit spaceyjessie / Foter / CC BY-NC-ND

Senate Bill 319 would bring Michigan into compliance with a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court ruling. It said automatically sentencing minors to life in prison without the possibility of parole is cruel and unusual. But it did not say whether the ruling applied to those already serving those sentences.

"Where's the humanity or justice in a legislature giving the opportunity for parole to one juvenile but not the other?" asked Rep. Rudy Hobbs, D-Southfield, during debate over the bill on the House floor. "Today, these young people and their advocates are asking us for the opportunity at redemption. And I support this opportunity for all juveniles."

Supporters of the bill, including Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette, say giving juvenile lifers a chance at re-sentencing would be too painful for victims' families.

But some lawmakers who voted 'yes' on the bill say they simply want to offer guidance to judges who are dealing with these cases and finally bring Michigan law into compliance with the 2012 ruling.

"There's no winners and losers in this - it's pain all around," said state House Criminal Justice Committee Chair Kurt Heise, R-Plymouth Township. "And I'm grateful that it's over, that we have some closure and some direction going forward. But for these families involved, I don't see any closure or any happiness."

There are currently about 350 juvenile lifers in Michigan. 

"Where's the humanity or justice in a legislature giving the opportunity for parole to one juvenile but not the other?" asked Rep. Rudy Hobbs, D-Southfield

The bill now goes to the state Senate, which passed an earlier version of the bill last year. It will need to approve changes made in the House.